Am I missing something? Is it because there is a learning curve? Cost? Because TB is good but not ideal? I'm quite surprised that there aren't more threads about using The Brain for academic (or other) research and synthesis of information. Makes more sense to me, than picking up another tool, I think. There's no learning curve for me anymore (except the back-link stuff, which nobody understands yet)Īnd I'll try organizing my reading with it. Probably an excellent job for a future Brain-API, if by then there's no solution. I figured I could see all scientific publications in a TB-style graph with "is citing" being children and "is cited by" being parents in some kind of super-plex. Honestly, having had my "how to read scientific papers" lecture yesterday, I was quite shocked, that there's no graph traversal for research papers yet.Īpparently being able to see for a given paper, which other paper reference it, in list-form (instead of just seeing what it references) is considered cutting-edge. They recommended very specialized things like Zotero (and seven other apps) to me. ![]() New about to start a seminar, where I have to look into loads of research papers in Human Machine Interaction. PersonalBrain 4.3 Experimental Release Archive
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |